Role-based access control (RBAC) is a method for controlling system access
based on roles assigned to users within an organization. RBAC is defined
around predefined roles and the privileges
associated with those roles (also known as role bindings). Roles are a collection
of permissions that you can bind to a resource; this binding
allows the privileges associated with that role to be performed on that resource.
You must grant the role to a principal at the time you bind a resource to the role.
Using RBAC, you can manage who has access to specific Confluent Platform resources, and the actions
a user can perform within that resource. RBAC leverages the Confluent Platform Metadata Service
to configure and manage your RBAC implementation from a centralized configuration
context, thereby simplifying access management across Confluent Platform resources.
Before implementing RBAC you should evaluate the security needs of the users in your
organization and, based on the resources they require to perform their duties,
group users into roles that satisfy those requirements. See RBAC Role Use Cases
for an example of this planning task. It is a best practice to limit users to the
minimum required role necessary for them to complete their assigned tasks.
Like ACLs, RBAC uses principals, so you can associate whatever principal a
client is using with an RBAC role, which is authorized by the Confluent Server Authorizer
to communicate with both RBAC and ACLs. For details about the Confluent Server Authorizer, see
Overview. RBAC roles do not support
DENY rules, and there is no difference in the way you create and use legacy ZooKeeper-based
ACLs while also using RBAC. However, if you intend to
continue using ACLs, we recommend that you migrate to centralized ACLs,
which store ACL information in MDS, just like role bindings. Legacy ZooKeeper-based
ACLs will continue to work in the meantime.
For details about enabling and configuring RBAC, see Metadata Service Configuration Options and Configure Metadata Service (MDS).
RBAC helps you:
Predefined role assignments determine who can access specific Confluent Platform resources, and what
actions an individual user can perform within that resource. An administrator
assigns predefined roles to users and groups on various resources; each user can
be assigned multiple roles on each resource. Certain privileged users (such as
the UserAdmin or SystemAdmin) assign roles to users and groups, and then
map specific resources to those user roles. For example, a ResourceOwner in
the finance department can grant department members access to all topics that use
the prefix finance_, which makes it easier for them to manage the resources
with which they are most familiar.
User administrators can add LDAP users and groups, making it quicker and easier
to centrally configure authentication and authorization for the various Confluent Platform resources
used in an organization.
With RBAC, the user administrator can map roles to LDAP users
and groups that are scoped to specific resources (role binding). After a role
binding is set using the
Confluent CLI confluent iam rolebinding create
command, users can’t go to
an API or Confluent Control Center to bypass and get access to resources. Binding roles to groups
enables client administrators to avoid having to grant explicit access to each
user across every component. For details about viewing role bindings, refer to
Confluent CLI confluent iam rolebinding list
command. Note that role binding does not support wildcard
matching in principal names. For details, refer to Wildcard principals.
When setting up role bindings (confluent iam rolebinding create), if you
need to troubleshoot, it may be helpful to view audit logs on the fly to identify
authorization events for specific principals, resources, or operations. For
details, refer to Viewing audit logs on the fly.
confluent iam rolebinding create
Confluent Platform Cluster Registry provides a way for cluster administrators to centrally register
Kafka clusters in the metadata service (MDS) to enable a more user-friendly RBAC
role binding experience. For details, refer to Cluster Registry.
MDS is the primary mechanism by which RBAC is implemented, and offers a single, centralized
configuration context that once set up for a cluster, saves administrators from
the complex and time-consuming task of defining and assigning roles for each
resource on an individual basis. The Confluent Platform MDS binds and enforces a Kafka cluster
configuration across different resources (such as topics, connectors, and schemas).
The Metadata Service (MDS) acts as the central authority for all authorization and authentication data.
You must configure each Kafka broker in the MDS cluster with MDS.
MDS provides ease of use and convenience in the implementation of role-based access control (RBAC);
it can also scale so that you can use this same non-binding permissions model to
offer other types of security.
Running on a Kafka broker, MDS is also integrated with LDAP to provide authentication
and refreshable bearer tokens for impersonation. The MDS is also the master of record
for role binding. For details about configuring LDAP integration with
RBAC, see Configuring the LDAP Authorizer and Configure LDAP Authentication.
For details about configuring MDS, see Configure Metadata Service (MDS).
RBAC serves as an additional authorization enforcement layer on top
of ACLs, and does not change the way ACLs are created
or managed. When considering whether to use RBAC or ACLs for access control, it
is suggested you use RBAC as the default because of its ease of use and manageability
at scale, but for edge cases where you need to have more granular access control,
or wish to explicitly deny access, ACLs may make more sense. For example, you
could use RBAC to allow access for a group of users, but an ACL to deny access
for a particular member of that group.
RBAC adds an additional authorization mechanism that addresses the following
authorization challenges when using ACLs:
Without RBAC, you cannot use ACLs to grant access to connectors. With RBAC, each
connector has its own principal that identifies access to resources. Users have access
only to connectors on which they have explicitly been granted permission. If
you require connector access control, RBAC is essential.
RBAC provides the ability to offer Confluent Control Center users granular access to resources; prior to RBAC,
any user with access to Confluent Control Center had full or read-only access to topics and resources.
If granular access control in Confluent Control Center is a requirement, RBAC is recommended.
RBAC provides a consistent authentication and authorization mechanism for users
access across the entire Confluent Platform, which is not possible if solely using ACLs.
Prior to RBAC, the creation and management of ACLs could be difficult to manage
and maintain, and in organizations with thousands of resources and users, ACL setup
could take a long time. With RBAC, the delegation of responsibility to various
resources is managed using the ResourceOwner role.
For example, say you are responsible for managing user access to 1000 topics.
Using RBAC, you could grant ResourceOwner to other users to manage the topics
owned by specific business units, and in turn, those users could manage access
for others within their own teams. Using ACLs in this scenario, you
would need to centrally manage access to all the topics, which would be a time
and resource-intensive task.
The following terms are used in RBAC:
For optimal performance of your RBAC configuration, we recommend that you adhere
to these limits.
The user ID specified in group role bindings is case-specific, and must match
the case specified in the AD record. Also note that when logging in as a super user,
the login ID is also case-specific and must match the case specified for the user
ID in role bindings.
The following user access HTTP error codes are in use for RBAC:
In some cases when a user’s credentials are correct, but the user does not have
the correct permissions, you would expect a 403 error instead of a 404 error.
In such cases, error code 403 is returned to avoid exposing details about
Schema Registry has many granular error codes that extend beyond the context of RBAC. See
Schema Registry API Reference for descriptions of Schema Registry HTTP errors (for example, 40401)
not covered here.
This section provides a checklist to help you plan your RBAC implementation.
Ansible offers a simpler way to configure and deploy RBAC and MDS.
Refer to Ansible RBAC settings
To set up RBAC:
☐ Install Confluent Platform.
☐ Work with your security team to evaluate the needs of the users in your
organization and and, based on the resources they require to perform their
duties, identify which roles should be assigned to users and groups.
For a description of some typical use cases and required roles for each, refer
to RBAC role use cases.
To bootstrap RBAC, you must identify an ACL-level super.user in the
Kafka broker’s server.properties file on the cluster that hosts MDS. This
super.user can then assign the SystemAdmin role to another user who can create
the required clusters and scope the required role bindings for users and groups.
Be sure to identify which user will serve as a bootstrap super.user. For
details, refer to Role-Based Access Control Predefined Roles.
☐ Configure the Metadata Service (MDS).
The MDS implements the core RBAC functionality and
communicates with LDAP to get user and group information
and authenticate users. After configuring MDS, you can proceed with role
bindings and configuration of other Confluent Platform components.
Refer to Configure the LDAP identity provider to view an LDAP configuration for MDS.
☐ After you have determined which roles must be assigned to users and groups,
create the appropriate role bindings for
users to access the resources (for example, Schema Registry, ksqlDB, Connect, and Confluent Control Center)
they require to perform their duties.
☐ Confirm the user and group roles you defined using the
confluent iam rolebinding list
☐ Configure Confluent Platform components to communicate with MDS for authentication and
authorization. For details, see:
To see a working example of role-based access control (RBAC), check out Confluent Platform demo.
This demo and accompanying tutorial show users how to deploy an Apache Kafka® event streaming application.
All the components in the demo have security enabled end-to-end, including RBAC.